There’s troublesome knowledge—and then there’s existential troublesome knowledge.
The concept of troublesome knowledge was developed in academia and has since been applied and utilized in many academic and non-academic areas including scientific exploration, mathematics, politics, finance, history, and even writing.
To refresh, knowledge is troublesome when it:
- conflicts with preexisting beliefs, especially if those beliefs are deeply held
- is counterintuitive or seems illogical
- is complex or difficult to understand
- is disconcerting
- requires a (transformational) change in self-perception
Troublesome knowledge within a field of inquiry or endeavor is one thing. But troublesome knowledge about the very nature of how we as humans function and our experience in and of the world—i.e., existential troublesome knowledge—is something else altogether. It’s troublesomeness squared, at the very least.
Many of our most basic assumptions about ourselves…are false. —Leonard Mlodinow, Subliminal
Phenomenal Individualism and Its Implications
The pursuit of existential troublesome knowledge leads us to a number of inescapable conclusions that point in the direction of what has been called phenomenal individualism.
- Our experience is not an accurate reflection of reality, which means things are not as they seem.
- We cannot fully know or access the experience of any other person or creature.
- What we don’t know far exceeds what we know, and no matter how much we learn, this will always be the case; yet we operate as if what we see is all there is (WYSIATI).
- Not only is everything everywhere in motion all the time, but everything (including each of us) is a process, and everything is an interpretation.
- Rather than being, or resembling, a mechanical system, each of us is a complex adaptive system, physically, mentally, and emotionally.
- These factors all constrain our experience of being in the world—and there is no way out of these constraints—but they also create a space of possibilities, including the possibility of creating transformational change.
I believe the fact that our experience is not an accurate reflection of reality is the foundational threshold concept that we must get (incorporate into our mental model) in order to grasp the nature of our existence and experience: our space of possibilities.
You may recall that threshold concepts are likely to be, among other things:
- Transformative: they lead to a significant shift in perspective that alters our sense of who we are as well as what we see, the way we see it, and how we feel and think about it.
- Irreversible: they involve crossing a “threshold,” after which our previous understanding is no longer readily accessible.
- Integrated: they reveal relationships and connections of aspects and ideas that were previously seen as unrelated.
- Troublesome: they are difficult concepts to grasp and are therefore troublesome (see troublesome knowledge above).
The Space of Possibilities
What you or I make of the characteristics that circumscribe our existence—how we interpret them and work with them—depends on our mental model of the world, which includes our personality and our beliefs.
Do you find the idea that things are not only not as they seem, but never as they seem disturbing, confusing, trivial, or intriguing?
Is the idea that the extent of what we don’t know will always be far greater than the extent of what we know frustrating, obvious, or expansive?
Does knowing that everything you experience is the result of your brain’s interpretation of data that other brains are very likely interpreting differently make you curious or does it feel unnerving or even threatening?
The Thin Slice
It has become clear that our brains sample just a small bit of the surrounding physical world. —David Eagleman, Incognito
Although what Eagleman says is true, and it’s possible to grasp the concept intellectually, it is simply impossible for us to experience. That’s because our brain is continuously assessing and interpreting the data it has access to as if it is all the data there is. How else could it operate?
If we really understand and acknowledge this aspect of reality—that we are always working with limited information we treat as if it is all the information—we must realize that a likely majority of the conclusions and explanations we take for granted are inaccurate, sometimes extremely so. Our brain can’t take into account factors of which it is unaware. Yet there are always factors that affect us of which we and our brain are unaware.
The conclusions and explanations we arrive at daily are often good enough for us to get by—not so erroneous they threaten our survival. But that isn’t always the case. And even if they don’t threaten our survival, they can modify our mental model in ways that lead to maladaptive perceptions of our internal and external world. Taking all of our perceptions for granted can have detrimental effects on our experience and therefore on our actions in and reactions to the world, as well as our wellbeing, and our relationships with others.
We are not significantly different from humans of the past who didn’t believe in the existence of germs or bacteria because they couldn’t see them with the naked eye. Or humans who believed the earth was the center of the solar system. Or that the brain was a useless organ—or that we only use 10% of it. Or that our memories are accurate, and eye-witness accounts are reliable.
When more information was obtained, we modified our understanding of germs and the solar system and the brain and memory and eye-witness accounts. We have enough information now to modify our understanding of how we operate and how our experience is based on our interpretations.
If we don’t, or don’t want to, understand this thing called phenomenal individualism, we will constantly be at the effect of our mistaken beliefs, locked into a perceptual and experiential system within which we have very little room to maneuver and no room at all to create transformational change.
On the other hand, we can step into and take an active role within this space of possibilities.
More to come!
Leave a Reply